March 22, 2005
James Wilson
Superintendent
Fulton County Schools
786 Cleveland Avenue, S.W.
Atlanta, GA 30315
Dear Jamie Boy:
Welcome to the Big Leagues. Now that you are superintendent (interim
or whatever) of a large school system, you now will have an "out house" (as opposed to an "in house") law firm whispering
directions into your novice ears at nearly every turn. These lawyers will remind you of potential liabilities and they might
even show you cute ways to avoid the mandates of certain laws. I hope that this is not the case with your administration’s
recent refusal to process the rather simple grievance filed by a teacher at xxx xxx Middle School against one of her
assistant principals whom the teacher alleges unduly embarrassed her in front of the entire faculty. I hope that this Cobb
County law firm (Brock Clay Calhoun Wilson & Rogers, P.C.) did not give you this ill advice. (I certainly don’t
think that Fulton’s former counsel, Judy O’Brien of Sutherland, Asbill & Brennan, LLP, would
offer such ill advice.) Perhaps this was truly the decision of Vickie Warren, Executive Director of Human Resources,
or Randy Reece, Chief Human Resources Officer. At Randy’s request, I just recently wrote a two page letter
to him (and copied you and the school board members), explaining in detail MACE’s position on the grievance law
(O.C.G.A. 20-2-989.5 et seq.). (See attachment.) After sending this letter, you guys rather begrudgingly processed
the grievance against Maureen Wheeler, principal at Palmetto Elementary School. However, when the grieving teacher
and I showed up for the Level II Grievance Hearing, we encountered a rather myopic and petulant hearing officer who actually
had the audacity to think that she could talk over me and keep me from entering procedural violations into the record. Needless
to say, her intentions did not work. She immaturely and abruptly closed down the hearing when I refused to allow her to trample
under her hoofs the rights of the teacher. Of course, the MACE Team proceeded to picket the principal and your administration
at the school board meeting the next evening. It wasn’t a very pretty site, but MACE is not necessarily into
prettiness. On the heels of that picket, xxx xxx received a letter from Vickie Warren wherein Vickie
says that Fulton County was not going to process her grievance. Well, well...that’s just too bad for you and The
Cobb Legion which is now running the Fulton County School System.
If you do not abide by the Georgia law relative to processing grievances
filed by teachers, then we will use any legal means to embarrass you. I have found that embarrassment is the most effective
way to make arrogant, cocky, and I’m-above-the-law type superintendents adhere to the mandates of the Georgia grievance
law (O.C.G.A. 20-2-989.5 et seq.), and it is by far the most efficient way to get their attention. MACE does
not make idle threats. Try us and see for yourself. In order to initiate the grievance process, the law only states that the
teacher must put his or her grievance "in writing" and "state clearly the intent of the employee to access the complaints
policy" (O.C.G.A. 20-2-989.8[1]). The statute further states that the teacher "shall be entitled to an opportunity
to be heard, to present relevant evidence, and to examine witnesses at each level" (O.C.G.A. 20-2-989.8[4]).
If you would actually take the time to read the law, you will find that there is no mention about impertinent and irascible
central office administrators being able to arrogate themselves to the level of a judge and to make a ruling on a pleading
-- or, just dismissing the grievance out of hand because they don’t think that the grievance is "appropriate." The only
caveat in the law deals with filing a complaint concerning evaluations, job performance ratings, professional development
plans, or hearings for termination, nonrenewal, demotion, suspension, or reprimand. Actions concerning a teacher’s certificate
is also excluded from the grievance process (O.C.G.A. 20-2-989.7[a]). Everything else is grievable if the teacher
feels that he or she "is affected in his or her employment relationship by an alleged violation, misinterpretation, or misapplication
of statutes [regardless of how the statutes are written], policies, rules, regulations, or written agreements of the
local unit of administration with which the local unit of administration is required to comply" (O.C.G.A. 20-2-989.6[4];
emphases and annotation added). The administration must at least hear the grievance. The immediate supervisor (at the
lowest level) or the hearing officer (at the upper levels) can rule against the teacher in his or her written disposition.
But, the administration cannot just whimsically decide that the grievance is not "appropriate" and thereby dismiss
it before it is even heard. This type of action would give the administrator the power to simply wave a magical wand
to dismiss any complaint which the administration felt was uncomfortable or annoying. Of course, I’m sure
that you realize that this is what your jack-leg administration is trying to do. I realize that you are the fifth (5th)
superintendent in two (2) years in Fulton County. However, we simply won’t stand by idly and allow your new administrative
goons to decide that they simply are not going to process a grievance. We fought those battles before and we will fight them
again, if that is what you want. What you do with a grievance from a teacher affiliated with GAE or PAGE is
entirely up to you. I don’t care. But, we will fight like a Doberman when it comes to a MACE member having his
or her rights violated.
The legislature included the following proviso in the grievance law:
"Nothing in this part shall be construed to prevent a local unit of administration from adopting supplemental rules and policies
not inconsistent with this part that grant additional substantive and procedural rights to the complainant with respect
to this part" (O.C.G.A. 20-2-989.9; emphasis added). The only matters that your administration can add to the mandates
in the grievance law are the ones "that grant additional substantive and procedural rights" to the teacher filing the grievance.
You can’t engage in some type of administrative hocus-pocus which enables the administration to conclude that it doesn’t
have to hear the grievance.
Until now, we have been focusing a lot of our attention on the real
"gangsta" system, the Atlanta Public Schools. But, if this latest episode dealing with xxx xxx grievance
at xxx xxx Middle School is any indication of how your Carpetbaggers from Cobb County
are going to operate, then perhaps we need to camp out some more in the illustrious Fulton County School System. It
has always been our standard and consistent policy at MACE that once a school system violates the grievance law and
refuses to process a private grievance, then MACE engages in very public pickets. One way or the other,
we will be heard.
Sincerely:
John R. A. Trotter, Ed.D.,J.D.
JRAT/pl
xxx xxx, xxx xxx Middle School
William L. Woods, Esq., MACE
xxx xxx, Assistant Principal, xxx xxx Middle School
DeWitt Walker, Administrator, Fulton County Schools
Leonard Box, Administrator, Fulton County Schools
Gary McGibonny, Deputy Superintendent, DeKalb County Schools
Matthew C. Billips, Esq.
Fulton County Board of Education Members
Sonny Perdue, Governor
Thurbert Baker, Georgia Attorney General
Kathy Cox, Georgia Superintendent of Schools
Stuart Bennett, Chief Deputy State Superintendent
Stan Pritchard, Administrator, DeKalb County Schools
Donald Rooks, Georgia School Boards Association
Herb Garrett, Georgia School Superintendent Association
Dr. Floyd D. Toth, Professional Standards Commission
Gary Walker, Director of Education Ethics, PSC
Jim Wooten, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Ken Foskett, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Jeff Nesmith, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Paul Downsky, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Sharon Pitts, Chief of Staff, Atlanta Public Schools
Dorsey Hobson, Staff Attorney, Atlanta Public Schools
Dr. Thelma Mumford-Glover, Atlanta Public Schools
David Brown, MACE Network Attorney
Sheryl D. Freeman, APS Employee Relations
Gary M. Sams, Clayton and DeKalb School Board Attorney
Randy Reece, Human Resources, Fulton
Dr. Barbara Pulliam, Superintendent, Clayton
Jack Warren, Central Office Administrator, Clayton
Crawford Lewis, Superintendent, DeKalb County Schools
Dr. Jim Williams, Deputy Superintendent (Ret.), DeKalb County Schools
Kelly A. Sherrill, Cobb and Fulton School Board Attorney
Glenn Brock, Cobb and Fulton School Board Attorney
Joseph J. Redden, Superintendent, Cobb
Harold Barnett, Superintendent, Marietta City
Alvin Wilbanks, Superintendent, Gwinnett
Trudy Sowar, Superintendent, Paulding
Dr. Jesse Bradley, Superintendent, Spalding
Raiford Cantrel, Superintendent, Gilmer
Dr. John DeCotis, Superintendent, Fayette
Dr. Jack Parish, Superintendent, Henry
Dr. Charles G. Larke, Superintendent, Richmond
Ruel M. Parker, Superintendent, Rockdale
John Phillips, Superintendent, Muscogee
James E. Humes, II, Muscogee School Board Attorney
Don Cooper, Human Resources, Muscogee
Tony Cook, Superintendent, Whitfield
Sharon Patterson, Superintendent, Bibb
Don Remillard, Superintendent, Douglas
Dr. Dennis Fordham, Superintendent, Hall
Carol Lane, Superintendent, Meriweather
Doug Day, Superintendent, Burke
Danny Carpenter, Superintendent, Houston
John Zauner, Superintendent, Carroll
Samuel Allen, Superintendent, Valdosta City
Thomas Wilson, Superintendent, Carrollton City
Blake Bass, Superintendent, Coweta
Dr. Frank Petruzielo, Superintendent, Cherokee
Dr. Dennis Chamberlain, Superintendent, Lamar
Dr. Florence Reynolds, Superintendent, Hancock
Albert Murray, Commissioner, GA Department of Juvenile Justice
The TeachersAdvocate.Com