December 22, 2006
Dr. Awanna Leslie,
Superintendent
Hancock
County School District
POB
488
Sparta,
GA 31087
Dear Superintendent
Leslie:
I understand that, during the preceding school year, you received correspondence from
MACE through MACE’s previous attorney, William L. Woods. Sadly, Attorney
Woods passed away of a heart attack during the summer, and I have taken his place as the General Counsel for MACE. In that guise, I write you today in outrage over a letter dated December
6, 2006, that Principal Davis Fender of Russell Middle School presented to Rita Hearns of the Media
Center. In his letter, Principal Fender
writes: “In response to your letter dated November 28, 2006, I am hereby charging you with direct insubordination.” That is the extent of his “response” to Ms. Hearns’ letter, which I have also read and
find to be quite professional and polite. I find Principal Fender’s response,
however, to be far from professional and hardly polite. It clearly displays animus
toward Ms. Hearns in that insubordination is listed in O.C.G.A. 20-2-040(a)
as the first of eight “grounds for termination or suspension” of a school’s certificated staff member; therefore,
Principal Fender’s letter exists as a threat to Ms. Hearns. Further, this
threat unfairly and illegally diminishes Ms. Hearns’ legal rights in that it has, as the Supreme Court has stated, “a
chilling effect on the First Amendment.” In her letter, Ms. Hearns innocently
and honestly indicates her valid opinion about her treatment at Russell. She
writes: “Often, I truly feel that I am being persecuted because I am trying
to fulfill my duties, and it appears that my gender is a vital issue under the circumstances when I report student offences.” Ms. Hearns, in quite a non-threatening manner, has indicated that she believes she
is being discriminated against because she is female, and it is logical that she would copy a letter in which she indicates
such discrimination up the chain of command. As an analogy, would one actually
expect the farmer to report the loss of his chickens to the fox only?
Perhaps Principal Fender took umbrage that Ms. Hearns copied her letter to you, thus
possibly embarrassing him; however, Ms. Hearns has every right to copy you and did so without endeavoring to circumvent Principal
Fender’s knowledge of what she had done. She indicated it in the letter. Principal Fender, however, has absolutely no legal authority to charge Ms. Hearns
with “direct insubordination.” In doing so, he has usurped your legal
authority as provided in O.C.G.A. 20-2-940, 942, 944 and, in doing so, has directly
committed an insubordinate act. For this, it is incumbent on you as his direct
supervisor, to reprimand him as well as to report his insubordination to the Professional Standards Commission. Failure to do so would cause you to be complicit in his violation of law and would further impede Ms. Hearns’
legal right of access to the First Amendment. Is it surprising, then, that Ms.
Hearns writes the following in the letter that Principal Fender finds so bothersome:
“My family is requesting to be present at any future conferences, and my attorney is politely, genuinely, and
respectfully offering his services at any future conferences to help clear up misconceptions and incongruencies.” Ms. Hearns’ professionalism can be clearly discerned through this sentence and
is underscored by the next one, in which she offers Principal Fender a face-saving way out:
“I do realize, Mr. Fender, that recently the truth has not always been available to you regarding the media center.” In her letter, Ms. Hearns seeks resolution and goes out of her way to show that this
resolution does not involve retribution against Principal Fender. He apparently
has the latter in mind.
In a response to Principal Fender, dated December 7, 2006, Ms. Hearns recounts what she believes to be the catalysis for
the problem with Principal Fender. She writes:
“This small group of abusive students have displayed unsatisfactory behavior:
loud, aggressive, intimidating, using profanity and skipping classes.”
These students, from the high school, included a female named Jonquil who, Ms. Hearns writes, “became irate the
third time that I refused to issue her scissors.” The scissors were not
issued because, as Ms. Hearns writes, “I did not have any scissors, because the media center had not received any supplies
to date.” Apparently, the student continued to harass Ms. Hearns in an
increasingly belligerent manner for scissors, running in and out of the library at will.
Ms. Hearns, after finally obtaining the student’s name, phoned the mother twice, first about the girl’s
belligerence about the scissors and again after the girl surreptitiously entrapped Ms. Hearns into speaking to her with the
mother listening in on a cell phone. Ms. Hearns’ statement as to what Principal
Fender apparently did next is quite telling: “I was accosted by you and
the assistant principal at my workstation in the media center. You stated that
I must assist all students, and you wanted an explanation as to why I did not give scissors to the students as they requested. I informed you about the repeated misbehavior of a small group of students and how
they have refused to obey the directions and instructions of media center staff. I
explained that I did not have scissors to give students because I have not had access to funds to purchase media center supplies.”
The interaction between Ms. Hearns and the students occurred on December 5, 2006, and the meeting among Principal Fender, Ms. Hearns, and an assistant principal
occurred the next day as did Principal Fender’s creation of a letter where he completely disregards Ms. Hearns’
account: “Several high school students complained about not being able
to receive assistance from you while working on their projects.” He continues: “. . . it is expected that everyone will assist the boys and girls of Hancock
County in their quest to become successful students and productive citizen [sic] within today’s society and that the
librarians are expected to assist students regardless of grade level as long as they are there for valid reasons and with
a pass. Please adhere and make sure this directive is followed.” What is there to misunderstand? The students needed scissors,
items Ms. Hearns did not have. After having been told this once, why would a
high school student need to be retold three or four times? Why were high school
students running in and out of the library looking for sharp, pointed metal objects in the first place? Why was it out of place for Ms. Hearns to want the Media Center
to be a quiet place for other students to work? Why did the students searching
for scissors fail to approach the art teacher for use of his/her supplies? Is
not the Media Center where a student
goes to read a book or magazine or surf the Internet for info? Why would a principal
want a Media Center to fulfill the purpose
of an art class? It strikes me that Ms. Hearns did attempt to assist the students,
but she was unable to meet their specific needs because, it would appear, Principal Fender had failed to enable his media
specialists to procure needed supplies. If he is so concerned about “the
boys and girls of Hancock County in their
quest to become successful students and productive citizen [sic] within today’s society,” then he would have
ensured scissors were available for their use in the Media Center
rather than admonishing Ms. Hearns for not helping them even though she could not, given the fact that she had no scissors.
I cannot imagine the primary responsibility of a media specialist to be to provide students
with scissors to complete “projects.” It seems to me incumbent on
the classroom teacher to make available to his/her students the materials necessary for completion of an assigned project. In fact, Ms. Hearns rightfully questions student use of scissors, something that Principal
Fender ignores: “I do need to know your policy regarding issuing scissors
to high school students, in order to adjust my responses to these student requests.”
How absurd that Ms. Hearns would ultimately be cited for “direct insubordination” over failure to provide
scissors, which could in certain situations be construed as weapons, to rude, wanton high school students who do not seem
able to understand the word “no.” What would Principal Fender have
written, much less done, had Ms. Hearns provided scissors to these free-wheeling students, and the scissors somehow became
embedded in one of the student’s chests? Would he have charged her with
“direct insubordination” then for having placed a dangerous implement in the hands of a future “productive
citizen”? I think not. Besides,
just what does “direct insubordination” mean? O.C.G.A. 20-2-940(a) has no reference to “direct insubordination,” but The American Heritage Dictionary
defines "insubordination" as a “condition or practice of not obeying,” something I categorically assert that Ms.
Hearns did not do because she did not have the means by which she could disobey. She
had no scissors to provide the students.
In conclusion, I ask that you provide immediate relief for Ms. Hearns. Please direct Principal Fender to rescind the letter in which he charges Ms. Hearns with “direct
insubordination” and have him pen a statement in which he avows that Ms. Hearns is a teacher in good standing at Russell
Middle. Also, please direct Principal Fender to treat Ms. Hearns with professional
respect so that she no longer feels that she works in an oppressive, hostile environment in which her gender is used against
her when she seeks assistance for the disciplining of unruly students. In addition
to reporting Principal Fender to the Professional Standards Commission, I would strongly suggest that you place him on a Professional
Development Plan in which he is mandated to review school law and to engage in training for human relations and interpersonal
relationships. I would assume that, since you have previously dealt with MACE
through Attorney Woods, you realize that MACE will not allow one of its members to be mistreated in any form or fashion. It is not the intent of MACE to cause problems for administrators; however, MACE will
not shirk from its responsibility to its members. I trust you will do the right
thing and that I will not have to contact you again concerning this matter.
Respectfully,
J. Anderson Ramay, Jr., Esq.
Copy: Rita Hearns, Teacher
John R. A. Trotter, Ed.D.,J.D., Chairman, MACE